Look at the large picture, autovivification is harm. Language should only do what programmer means to do.
I personally believe that you may be surprised to learn that as far as I'm concerned, for one, with autovivification Perl does exactly what I mean to do. Such seems to be the case with most other Perl programmers: that it isn't with you doesn't constitute an argument of universal validity. My own opinion differs with the general consensus on some issue every now and again...
In reply to Re^6: exists on hash autovivifies right?
by blazar
in thread exists on hash autovivifies right?
by Anonymous Monk
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |