That in turn perpetuates thinking about people as a resource to be exploited, and generates inaccurate analogies such as your memory being "like a harddisk".
That's hardly a new concept. After all, slavery predates computing machines by a few millenia.
It makes little sense to me, even less than the concept of programming language. It's not a language, folks. It's a notation.It's useful to think of programming or computer languages as languages, not notations, and it's probably especially useful to people who design them. Not doing so leads to APL.
A computer is not a living being. It has no consciousness, you cannot talk with it…
Of course I can; with the correct software and hardware it will even understand what I'm saying. I don't expect an intelligent dialogue, but I don't necessarily expect a response (or at least a rational response) when I talk with a person, either.
In reply to Re^2: Perl and Linguistics
by swampyankee
in thread Perl and Linguistics
by Cody Pendant
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |