One thing that immediately jumps out at me as confusing, though, is the use of the word "lambda" as a constructor (or whatever it is it does). It's really confusing to Lisp programmers. (That, and lambda is just a really hard word to type on a QWERTY keyboard - I don't even like to use it much in Lisp).
Also: any benchmarks, or just a general indication of the framework's structure WRT overhead etc? Currently, I would probably consider a considerable speed differences a deal maker or breaker when choosing an async IO framework.
In reply to Re: IO::Lambda - suggestions wanted
by Joost
in thread IO::Lambda - suggestions wanted
by dk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |