There are two reasons why I would not want to. First working with the heavily tie()d datastructure is slower and second it lets you get away with treating a repeatable tag as if it always occured just once. Which means that instead of XML::Simple's default behaviour of noisy failure or apparent stringified reference and XML::Rules::inferRulesFromXxx's consistent generation of array, you get a silent incorrect result.
In reply to Re^2: Simpler than XML::Simple
by Jenda
in thread Simpler than XML::Simple
by Jenda
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |