Using memcached in front of a database gives me the best of both worlds
This was kind of how I thought memcached fit best with OtoDB. As the code currently stands, you will only be able to add a certain number of data servers before querying them all incrementally will prove a bottleneck (at least if my intuition doesn't fail me here). memcached is the obvious choice to keep queries frosty as you add more servers.
Also, to go along with your other point, an RDBMS also makes it easy to rebalance data, e.g. if you add new servers to a set of existing servers, and want to move some of the load over.
In reply to Re^3: RFC: OtoDB and rolling your own scalable datastore
by arbingersys
in thread RFC: OtoDB and rolling your own scalable datastore
by arbingersys
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |