This might sound inelegant, but what I've done in the past is inject a subroutine into the LWP::UserAgent package that occludes the original get_basic_credentials(). I define this routine either to supply the credentials directly, or make it a closure so I can use it to install a callback.
I know its probably pretty far from best practice. I also think having to subclass the useragent to supply credentials is a bit naff.
In reply to Re: How to define a package using a tweaked version of LWP::UserAgent?
by spacebat
in thread How to define a package using a tweaked version of LWP::UserAgent?
by pwolfenden
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |