I often will use for instead of map for generating lists, especially when I am in the process of developing the code. Once I've got things figured out I might go back and re-code the loop as a map.

Using for has the following advantages:

If the list-generation logic is just a simple transformation, I'll just opt for a map implementation. Once, however, the logic becomes more complex, an explicit for loop begins to look more attractive. For instance, which of the following do you find easier to understand?
my @result = map { f($_) ? g($_) : () } @list; # or: my @result; for (@list) { push(@result, g($_)) if (f($_)); }

In reply to Re: map versus for by pc88mxer
in thread map versus for by dHarry

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.