UPDATE: And then there is Rose::DB::Object, too.
I apologize for the OT and I realize the age of the post I'm replying to. But it is in some way... slightly... very slightly in topic: Since various Rose::* modules were mentioned, I must say that some time ago for some reason I ignore myself, I've been wandering through quite a lot of them on the web interface to CPAN, reading their documentation -and I don't need them for any actual project, which is the reason why I don't know "the reason why"- and there's one thing I failed to understand at all: the name of the game! Namely: what is "Rose" supposed to mean? The very Rose module doesn't explain that. I thought there may be an interesting story behind it. Of course a rose is a nice flower that most people like, but then... an acronym, or a backronym? Nothing?
In reply to [OT] "Rose?!?" [was: "Re: Perl ORM comparison (Class::DBI vs. DBIx::Class vs. Rose::DB::Object)"]
by blazar
in thread Perl ORM comparison (Class::DBI vs. DBIx::Class vs. Rose::DB::Object)
by aulusoy
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |