To be fair, I hadn't even remotely thought of (i) the problem of logical drives being really part of the same physical drives, nor -more importantly- of (ii) plobsing++'s subtleties, assuming naively that a much simpler logic involving (something like) a %is_in_use hash holding arrayrefs of "transfers" (of which the first one to be considered active) would do. But eventually you're right that if I still roll up this enqueing utility/experiment of mine, then I may want to skip all the hassle and just enque everything at the user's request.
In reply to Re^3: Seeking general directions for a Windows specific app
by blazar
in thread Seeking general directions for a Windows specific app
by blazar
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |