I personally believe and hope that this node can be considered as an "ever active one" so I won't clutter Meditations with this "new" idea of mine like I've been tempted to do, but post it as a followup here...
Well, here's my modest proposal re join: if the first argument passed to it is a reference, then it should not stringify it (which is unlikely to ever having been useful, and thus should not break any backwards compatibility) but
In reply to Re: what would you like to see in perl5.12?
by blazar
in thread what would you like to see in perl5.12?
by ysth
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |