Yes. I one case the special behaviour is restricted to only declarations, in the other case it would be expanded to arbitrary code. (Or at least one statement of arbitrary code). That's quite a difference, IMHO.

But my opinion doesn't count that much ;-)

Luckily Perl 6 fixes that behaviour by not special casing the scoping at all, and instead introducing blocks with signatures ("pointy blocks", known as lambdas in other programming languages).

# Perl 6 code below: while my $x < 3 { # code here } # $x still visible here for @list -> $y { # $y visible here } # $y not visible here # other uses for lambdas: my $quote = -> Str $s { "'$s'" }

In reply to Re^5: Lexical scope vs. postfix loops (perl bug?) by moritz
in thread Lexical scope vs. postfix loops (perl bug?) by jh

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.