. Imagine also that, at the very same time, both AOL/Netscape and Microsoft have signed treaties promising that they'll follow the W3C specs by the letter. Now, if you've got a shitload of code floating around which extensively uses literal HTML (be it quoted, with here-docs, or using the __DATA__ facility), you're going to have a lot of editing to do... (and just try to cook up an HTML-to-SEXP translator script!). Whereas if you're using the CGI module's facilities, all you have to do is change a few functions here and there, and you're all set - and your CGI programs will be the only ones that work with the newest releases of Nutscrape and Exploder!-HTML- -HEAD- -TITLE-Bla-/TITLE- -/HEAD- -BODY- -IMG src="foo.bar"- -/BODY- -/HTML- -/CODE- (think <> instead of --), but instead <CODE> (in-html (cons (in-head (in-title "Bla")) (cons (in-body (img :source +"foo.bar")) '()))
In reply to RE: RE: RE: Re: Formatting CGI
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Formatting CGI
by brysonic venture
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |