Why wouldn't that call the function passing in @_ and check defined on the result? I mean, I see that it doesn't do that, but why? You have to put the ()'s on the end of it to get what I'd expect.
-Paul
In reply to Re^2: How to check if a function exists within a package?
by jettero
in thread How to check if a function exists within a package?
by rapide
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |