I've also noticed that some people consider "pure perl" to be the same as "core perl" - that is, just the modules that come with perl itself. This definition has annoyed me, but I thought it worth pointing out. This definition, which is closer to your guess, still allows for "use" directives - as long as what you're using comes with perl itself, such as File::Copy or File::Spec or even, on Windows, Win32.
In reply to Re: What defines "Pure Perl"?
by Tanktalus
in thread What defines "Pure Perl"?
by dh1760
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |