Finally, you could perhaps shed some light on how what I am talking about is not scalable ... Portable? .... Efficient?
I'm not for one moment going to suggest that a forking solution, where (native) forks are available, couldn't be just as scalable and efficient. Or even moreso. But, until you have implemented such a solution, you will not be aware of how hard it can be to make it so. And you won't truely appreciate the simplicity of threaded version, until you see the complexity of the forked version.
And when you post your solution, we can try running them on *nix and windows and compare them for those 3 criteria.
In reply to Re^4: Converting a parallel-serial shell script
by BrowserUk
in thread Converting a parallel-serial shell script
by Corion
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |