Lists like this are often incomplete, but later on enhanced by people who notice that their beloved tool is missing.
So if you care about CGI::Application, go ahead and add it there. The fact that it's missing today neither means that it must be missing tomorrow, or that it's not worth being listed.
In reply to Re: Is CGI::Application a wallflower?
by moritz
in thread Is CGI::Application a wallflower?
by leocharre
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |