When I write OO-Perl, I use inside-out objects, and I find myself frequently typing up lists of very simple accessors like the following:
sub foo : lvalue { $dat{ +shift }->{ 'foo' } }
Today I got fed up with the COBOL Fingers effect and wrote a tiny filter which lets me type
dat_attr foo;
...which is filtered into the original version above.
Surely, surely it's been done before, in an even more elegant and intuitive manner, right? I glanced through Class::Accessor and its derivatives, but they're quite robust, so I didn't find anything as trivial as this.
So what's my faux pas? My maxima culpa? How many Perler Nosters does this warrant? Ave Larrias?
package Class::Attr::Lvalue;
use Filter::Simple;
FILTER
{
s/(\w+)_attr (\w+)(\s*);/sub $2$3: lvalue { \$$1\{ +shift }->{ '$2'
+ $3 } }/g;
# print;
}
1;
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
| |
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.