I would say "go for it". See Crap is Gold for the long version of why.
You could also try working with the author of Image::Magick to improve the module, but I am not sure that's possible, depending on the extent of the changes you want to make. You be the judge of whether that's possible. BTW I don't quite understand your remark about Image::Magick being procedural. It is object-oriented.
In reply to Re: Image::Magick: Still the best? Can it be improved?
by mirod
in thread Image::Magick: Still the best? Can it be improved?
by ggvaidya
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |