OK. I can just about imagine how assignment to an ordinary scalar and assignment via an alias would be the same at run-time -- at run-time it doesn't much matter where the pointer to the SV has come from.
However, I would have thought that the two must be distinguished at compile time -- something has to take care of the implied dereference -- for no run-time penalty.
I realise that there are plenty of other traps for the new and the unwary -- but I can still remember the pain of learning about this one !
In reply to Re^5: Changing array by changing $_?
by gone2015
in thread Changing array by changing $_?
by johnvandam
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |