Please report this as a bug using the perlbug command. The documentation and behaviour don't match, and therefore one or both needs to be fixed.
Based upon a glance over the code, I'd say that it's Perl that needs fixing; if this behaviour of the ternary operator is documented, and it works some of the time, then it's probably perl that needs fixing, with a note in the documentation that the ?: operator may fall down with more complex expressions.
In reply to Re: "one tainted value taints the whole expression"
by pjf
in thread "one tainted value taints the whole expression"
by duelafn
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |