But, no, I really don't see a "win" in replacing <b> with the equally-verbose [b] especially since [b] already means something at PerlMonks.on a us-english layout, you don't need the shift key =)
a big win I see is: much less badly formatted posts. many users don't seem to recognize that they have to add html-paragraph tags instead of just adding a blank line.
I'm not saying perlmonks should use bbcode; I see the conflicts with current markup, I'm only saying there are advantages over pseudo-html.
In reply to Re^5: Wiki-Style syntax for posting (which)
by tinita
in thread Wiki-Style syntax for posting
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |