I personally believe that it's by far too verbose, losing the original attempt at conciseness, but the latter could be recovered by means of of suitable (pseudo? unofficial?r) protocol/scheme (or whatever it's really called like...) so I think that the Perl 6 syntax should really be:
1,-3,-8...oeis://A046970
How's that for self-documenting code?
In reply to Re^7: Numerically generate the perl sequence 1, 11, 111, ....
by blazar
in thread Generate the perl sequence 1, 11, 111, ....
by alih110
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |