I don't really understand how exposing the offsets and length would not be the full abstraction. Exposing the number of the numbered capture might still be a better interface even that way.
In reply to Re^3: Why are 5.10's named captures read only? (step 3)
by ambrus
in thread Why are 5.10's named captures read only?
by blazar
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |