I think the problem is program code vs. execution.
Look at this code:
sub foo {
...
return ($x, $y, $z);
}
By the definition, this sub returns a list. We all know
that during runtime, it might not be a list, but how else
would you describe what the sub is returning
shortly?
Now this code:
my $x = foo();
This is a function call in scalar context. Now, together
with the definition of the subroutine above, the sub
somehow returns the list in scalar context. By definition.
Which, during runtime turns out to be a scalar,
because the list never existed, because perl knows the
context early enough. So I would agree there is no list
in scalar context during runtime, but for me it's clearly
describing what code does. Whenever I read another
post "There is no list in scalar context" I think, *sigh*,
yeah, there might never exist such a list, but it's a
good description of the behaviour.
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
|
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.