Rather than trying to make the code run millions of tests, I would have instead addressed organizing my tests into smaller test groups: 10 suites consisting of 1 million tests max. Was there some reason you could not break out your tests into groups? It appears that you are generating these tests dynamically somehow ... it seems to me that adding another loop or such to that would allow you to run several passes over smaller groups in separate execs and collect the results after each run.
jeffa
L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L-- -R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B-- H---H---H---H---H---H--- (the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)
In reply to Re: More tests than you shake a memory stick at
by jeffa
in thread More tests than you shake a memory stick at
by kyle
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |