It sure seems like a bug to me.

Yes, I've reached the same conclusion after having played around with this some more.

The issue can be reduced to the following simple test case: 

use re 'Debug' => "EXECUTE";

say "xb" =~ /^(?(?!a) (?=bb)).b$/x       ? "yes":"no"; # -> yes (wrong
+)
say "xb" =~ /^(?(?!a) (?{}) (?=bb)).b$/x ? "yes":"no"; # -> no  (corre
+ct)

[download]

The first case incorrectly matches. However, introducing a dummy eval (?{}) in the second case produces the correct result...

The 'use re 'Debug' => "EXECUTE";' shows the execution differences (both versions compile to the same code — except for the eval, obviously): 

Guessing start of match in sv for REx "^(?(?!a) (?=bb)).b$" against "x
+b"
Guessed: match at offset 0
Matching REx "^(?(?!a) (?=bb)).b$" against "xb"
   0 <> <xb>                 |  1:BOL(2)
   0 <> <xb>                 |  2:LOGICAL[1](3)
   0 <> <xb>                 |  3:UNLESSM[0](9)
   0 <> <xb>                 |  5:  EXACT <a>(7)
                                    failed...
   0 <> <xb>                 |  9:IFTHEN(20)
   0 <> <xb>                 | 11:IFMATCH[0](20)
   0 <> <xb>                 | 13:  EXACT <bb>(15)
                                    failed...
   0 <> <xb>                 | 20:REG_ANY(21)     <-- incorrectly cont
+inues here
   1 <x> <b>                 | 21:EXACT <b>(23)
   2 <xb> <>                 | 23:EOL(24)
   2 <xb> <>                 | 24:END(0)
Match successful!
yes
Guessing start of match in sv for REx "^(?(?!a) (?{}) (?=bb)).b$" agai
+nst "xb"
Guessed: match at offset 0
Matching REx "^(?(?!a) (?{}) (?=bb)).b$" against "xb"
   0 <> <xb>                 |  1:BOL(2)
   0 <> <xb>                 |  2:LOGICAL[1](3)
   0 <> <xb>                 |  3:UNLESSM[0](9)
   0 <> <xb>                 |  5:  EXACT <a>(7)
                                    failed...
   0 <> <xb>                 |  9:IFTHEN(22)
   0 <> <xb>                 | 11:EVAL(13)
   0 <> <xb>                 | 13:IFMATCH[0](22)
   0 <> <xb>                 | 15:  EXACT <bb>(17)
                                    failed...
                                  failed...
Match failed
no

[download]

In reply to Re^4: Oddity with Conditional Regex (bug!) by almut
in thread Oddity with Conditional Regex by Rabscuttle

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.