I gave you a reason for preferring the Perl style for loop in general - fewer parts to go wrong. Eliminating a variable is not generally the important difference between two different for loop usages. Indeed:

for my $index (0 .. $#array) {
    ...
}

[download]

Is generally a much better solution than:

for (my $index = 0; $index < $#array; ++$index) {
    ...
}

[download]

because the range of the Perl loop is much easier to see and harder to get wrong.

In general we can say what sort of for loop is better - Perl for loops. '"C-style" is bad because of useless $i variable' is not the reason however.

Perl reduces RSI - it saves typing

In reply to Re^4: C-style for loop by GrandFather
in thread C-style for loop by mandog

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.