You want just &name;, not goto &name;.
Thanks a lot for the clarification. Unfortunately, in my particular application I think I need the 'goto' form, but I can solve the problem by using just usual package global variables. It's not a nice solution, but it affects only a few closely coupled subroutines, so I don't think I will run into maintenance problems.
In reply to Re^2: goto &sub and local question
by rovf
in thread goto &sub and local question
by rovf
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |