The first script I ran was as is shown above. My output was:
"In the beginning there was , in the end there will be . "
B: I believe the output was this way because when the subroutine
was called via the subroutine(); nothing was passed to the subroutine via the '()' thus there
were no valid local (to the subroutine) variables called
'_' therefore nothing being substituted in those slots.
C: On the other hand when you change the subroutine(); to &subroutine; it printed:
"In the beginning there was nothing, in the end there will be nothing. "
The reason this occurred is because when calling a subroutine
with the '&' the sub automagically "sees" the global scalar
array named '_'.
I admit, lexical scope vs dynamic scope is still confusing to me and
arrays with scope are questionable by me too. I'd be
interested to know how close I am to being correct.
In reply to Re: NEWBIE Brain Teaser #2, by nysus
by snafu
in thread NEWBIE Brain Teaser #2, by nysus
by nysus
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |