Yea, I guess.. serialize it.. maybe seek memory somehow- for a live instance of this- how to go about it is way beyond me.
I think simply using cache in this case- there is no way you could keep various instances in sync without molesting the system resources. We're not talking about storing some value of some expensive operation to a timeframe resolution- but .. an instant kind of .. storage.
I guess this is more an ipc thing.
Dunno, daemonizing or using some witchy pipe or some other posix conjuration.
But yea- as the original post- I don't think this kind of behaviour is something you would want to have happen without being fully aware of what's up- every process on the system accessing the same chunk of memory space- very insteresting though.
Thanks for clarifying, you rock.
In reply to Re^2: what is the real scope of a singleton
by leocharre
in thread what is the real scope of a singleton
by leocharre
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |