The additional sigils complicate Perl, the aliases would simplify it. With the aliases I could declare a hash as being the same as the one referenced by some complicated expression, with the sigils I would still have to make distinction between a hash and a hash ref and the only thing I would save is an ocassional -> or %{}. For the price of introducing another special character.
Lexical aliases should have been in the language since 5.0. Additional sigils should not be there at all. IMHO of course.
In reply to Re^3: Two more Features Perl 5 Maybe Needs
by Jenda
in thread Five Features Perl 5 Needs Now
by Arunbear
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |