Actually, I've used relatively browser-idependant (required frames) web interfaces with tree controls that were about as fast as (sometimes faster than) using Windows Explorer (the file explorer, not IE). This probably has a lot to do with how slow Windows Explorer can be. (: But that does help "set the bar" of user expectation so that a portable web interface is not unreasonable.
I appreciated being given the option of a reasonable interface without having to open myself up to JavaScript attacks (or even pop-up ads).
(Then the web mail software was upgraded and the tree control disappeared and the site became amazingly slow.)
- tye (but my friends call me "Tye")In reply to (tye)Re: building an HTML based tree UI
by tye
in thread building an HTML based tree UI
by jptxs
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |