That being said, I recently reached for Class::Base and started my work. But I find the accessor specs for Class::Base to be a bit more involved than I like... in a way they are nice because you can do anything you want in the init() method to verify anyway you want.
But I think using Mouse as a prelude to Moose is a good thing. Do we have any recent feedback on whether Moose will become a part of Perl core in a upcoming Perl release?
Any +/- feedback on Mouse?
In reply to Mouse as prelude to Moose? by metaperl
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |