That is interesting, I realize I tend to start from 'make it right, then make it run.' My reasoning for this is that I know how I want my code to look and where I want my values to be so I focus on putting things in the 'right' place. So when I have to go make it run I know where all the problems should be. I not saying that I don't have bugs, gods knows that I ain't true, but at least I should a general idea of where the problem is going to be.
I see too many programs that were written to run first, and never bother going to the second step. The usual explanation being, if it runs, it must be right! :)
In reply to Re^2: what are all the things to be considered to write a effective perl script or module?
by Herkum
in thread what are all the things to be considered to write a effective perl script or module?
by balakrishnan
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |