This may be a good exercise, but I'm not so convinced it's the best thing to do in practice. You now have 5 classes, each with a single method? That seems a little contrived. I would stick with the switch statement.
Update: I guess you said the same thing later in your post; I should have read it more carefully. I'd still like to reinforce your feeling with my own. I wouldn't bother solving all the problems you listed.
In reply to Re: replace conditionals with polymorphism
by revdiablo
in thread replace conditionals with polymorphism
by Anonymous Monk
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |