Agreed, and that is what my bug report says :-). The connection is supposed to be one-at-a-time, which, to me as well, means that they should be catching if a second call is made before the first connection is released.
--MidLifeXis
In reply to Re^2: Is assigning undef required for DESTROY to run?
by MidLifeXis
in thread Is assigning undef required for DESTROY to run?
by MidLifeXis
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |