Since this is listed under "News," I'll take it that the last question is rhetorical.

The assertion that other primitive and abandoned projects are listed and so MojoMojo should be as well is based on a logical fallacy (argument from common practice). Just because other projects which appear to be non-notable have not had their articles deleted deleted doesn't make this article notable.

Second, the OP seems to deliberately insult the decision-making abilities of people who support deletion, saying they have "nothing better to do than delve into ... astrology", and that they have "jumped on the bandwagon", implying they can't think for themselves. Ad hominem, both.

A proper argument would describe the notability standards for wikipedia and simply demonstrate that this article meets them. I haven't been at PerlMonks long, but this doesn't seem like the right place for that discussion.

MojoMojo seems like a really great project, but I don't think this write-up serves the project very well. The OP is obviously very passionate about the project, which is a good thing, but those energies are probably better spent elsewhere.

On the other hand, if the whole point of this was just to get people to check out MojoMojo, it worked. :)

In reply to Re: Is Wikipedia afraid of MojoMojo? by bellaire
in thread Is Wikipedia afraid of MojoMojo? by dandv

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.