Since it looks like you're working with a hash (%h), couldn't you just use keys and values?
...roboticus@k = keys %h; @v = values %h;
In reply to Re: functional opposite of zip
by roboticus
in thread functional opposite of zip
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |