1. Comment not previously mentioned, or, I would think, safely assumed. Magic is secret until proven otherwise ;-)
2. In the future, please warn other monks that they're entering a socratic dialogue zone, wherein the reasonable assumption that people mean what they say isn't valid. Otherwise, you're basically baiting a rhetorical trap with flawed arguments, then declaiming as unsophisticated those who take them in the spirit that custom and logic suggests be the default reading.
Maybe just a line reading: "Socrates sez," or an ASCII graphic of Admiral Ackbar.
To make sure I'm being perfectly clear: I'm not (nor ever really was) indignant at you for either the first comment or this one; I just think that, intentionally or no, you're basically lecturing people for taking your statements in good faith, who have no reason to do otherwise.
In reply to Re^4: disappearing segfault
by pobocks
in thread disappearing segfault
by cfreeman
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |