my point is that this could be the basis for a new artificial intelligence language, which precisely ( unless FUBAR'd :-) ) convey exact meaning to a word with many meanings. So something likeHi, it's not very Perl::like in language::structure but a cool improvement to identifing word::connotation Imagine( 'a language that appends connotation to words')
and the separator to connotation would be a chr(Ox1), and deeper nesting with chr(++). Then you could transmit info to robots the exact info you want it to do, with no ambiguity. Now "ambiguity" (fixed spelling) is a hard question to deal with. I'm working on a Tk gui to simulate how a qauntuum tunnel link may be able to pass digital information. I got the idea from watching how the swivel head walker wheels pivot and slip on a waxy floor, and how it performs "slipage wise"Gort: Please turn on the Toaster:bread:! world_burner
That slippage is the ambiguity. A tight link has zero slippage... zero ambiguity. The real world has circular ambiguity for certain, but the slippage could be 3-d or even 4-d. !!
Oops, I forgot these are the detailed plans for my space-time roomba......cleaning up fabric-tears. :-)
Yes, my life has ultimately brought me to this. :-( On my knees, contemplating travel on the astral plane.
In reply to Re: Ode to SQL
by zentara
in thread Ode to SQL
by codeacrobat
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |