When I do need to worry about '0', I generally stick with
if (defined $x and $x ne '')Now I'm wondering if there's any particular advantage of using "length($x)" over "$x ne ''"?
If $x is a sub parameter and both '0' and 'undef' are acceptable input, then I sanitize it right up front so I don't have to worry about undefined warnings later in the code when I start using/testing with it.
my $x = shift; $x = '' unless defined $x;
In reply to Re: testing defined($x) && length($x)
by ruzam
in thread testing defined($x) && length($x)
by perl5ever
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |