Something else occurred to me. Etiquette from the author side.
When receiving a patch that passes muster I think it's important that the author acknowledges it formally in the docs. Not necessarily in the main Pod but in the Changes file at least. This helps show Perl hackers who are active, productive, and important but maybe don't have a CPAN presence to put on their resumes. I've seen some of the most popular CPAN authors do this and it is one of the things I like about the Perl community; a real sense of reciprocity and friendliness.
In reply to Re: Patch Etiquette?
by Your Mother
in thread Patch Etiquette?
by pileofrogs
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |