Update: The number of matches came as a big suprise to blokhead so I like the way you consolidated results. The reason I limited the matching to a single input was because of the enormous amount of output when doing all possible matches as blokhead first asked for though I coded it to find all matches. Would your approach have changed if you were doing all matches not just one for the input provided?
Cheers - L~R
In reply to Re^2: Challenge: prefix($x, $y) . suffix($x, $z) eq $x
by Limbic~Region
in thread Challenge: prefix($x, $y) . suffix($x, $z) eq $x
by Limbic~Region
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |