The following are additions that have been requested, but I have been reluctant to add due to them being very simple to implement in perlIn my opinion it does not matter if something is easy. The purpose of a module is to support the DRY principle. If it seems likely that many people will need something and hence lead to many people writing the same thing, then it needs to be widely available in a high availability module.
opinions?
In reply to On the rejected additions to List::Util by metaperl
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |