I don't think the topic has drifted.
The point I wanted to make was that a ternary conditional is a viable alternative to introducing a scope (a 3-line if), if statement modifiers are not favoured by local shop practices. (Which is a reasonable edict, even if I don't agree with it myself).
I'm not sure where you saw the explicit undef?
There was none. It came about in my snippet from employing a ternary, which requires one to put something "in the else" part.
• another intruder with the mooring in the heart of the Perl
In reply to Re^5: Does eval cause that much of a performance hit?
by grinder
in thread Does eval cause that much of a performance hit?
by sherab
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |