or the server admins updated Perl and the new version refers to this kind of thing differently? So I'm inquiring about the second possiblity - did the way you refer to this change in a recent update of Perl?Wouldn't it be more efficient if you first check whether your perl was upgraded before asking such questions?
In reply to Re: Something changed in how to refer to length of hash of arrays?
by JavaFan
in thread Something changed in how to refer to length of hash of arrays?
by punch_card_don
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |