This is of course all style - the best programs are those that actually run. You certainly shouldn't worry about refactoring working code, and if any of these ideas go against what has worked for you, take them with a grain of salt.

By limiting the scope of variables to the smallest range possible, you reduce the possibility of misusing those variables. Following what you posted, I would have written it as:

#_ Check for minimum number of command line argument variables if($#ARGV < 6) { Usage(); print "NOT ENOUGH COMMAND LINE ARGUMENTS\n"; exit 0; } #_ Command line options & setup filenames my($alignment_file, $scorecons_file, $image_file, $numbered_model, $cs +a_file); foreach my $i (0 .. $#ARGV) #for ($i=0; $i<=$#ARGV; $i++) { if($ARGV[$i] eq "-a") { $alignment_file = $ARGV[$i+1]; } if($ARGV[$i] eq "-s") { $scorecons_file = $ARGV[$i+1]; } if($ARGV[$i] eq "-i") { $image_file = $ARGV[$i+1]; } if($ARGV[$i] eq "-m") { $numbered_model = $ARGV[$i+1]; } if($ARGV[$i] eq "-c") { $csa_file = $ARGV[$i+1]; } } if (not defined $csa_file) { Usage(); print "No CSA file defined\n"; exit 0; } print "test $csa_file\n"; my $fh_csa = new FileHandle($csa_file, "r") or die "Cannot open CSA file: $csa_file ($!)";

I've made a few changes here. First, I moved your argument count to before you attempt to parse your argument list since that is a more basic test. Second, I swapped to a foreach loop, and declared $i to be scoped to that loop. Since an iterator is localized to a loop anyway, it is essentially a separate variable already - giving it a unique name makes this more explicit. If your _file variables all behave like script globals, I agree that they should be declared as early as possible in your script. If they only have meaning in the context of the command line arguments and some file handles, then it is a good idea to declare them near to where they get their values, so no one attempts to use them before they are defined. This is also why I added a my to your file open.


In reply to Re^5: Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string error after adding new arguement on command line by kennethk
in thread Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string error after adding new arguement on command line by Angharad

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.