I thought about wrapping the sons as pp packages, but it looks silly - the difference between fathers and sons is their bytecode, so why to replicate the whole thing, including the interpreter ?
I understand that an interpreter instance has to be invoked per father/son, but why to replicate all the binary files belonging to interpreter ?
In reply to Re^2: pp - where is the Perl interpreter ?
by sergstesh
in thread pp - where is the Perl interpreter ?
by sergstesh
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |