I had modified my code to clearly? show myself that the variables were defined. I had no other reason why this particular 'if' statement would generate a message. The script does not fail, just generates this message. So the first if-else was just debug. The problem seems more related to the =~ compare, but again, never seen this message before on something that seemed to work in all other aspects/places. I don't want to say this, but it used to work. ;-)
In reply to Re^2: Use of unintialized value in pattern match (m//) at x.pl line 123
by gibsonca
in thread Use of unintialized value in pattern match (m//) at x.pl line 123
by gibsonca
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |