They all look they are generating 'legal' MIME information. (Although I'm willing to be proved wrong on that.) The question is which produces the best MIME-type for your files. From what you've shown, File::MIMEInfo::Magic seems to do a fairly good job on a wide variety of files, although it is possible one of the others does a better job on the files you most commonly send.
As for matching what your email client generates: It's got it's own system for doing this, and it may or may not generate a better MIME type for any specific file.
Basically, there may be several different MIME types that could be used for a specific file, depending on the level of specificity available to the software on either end. In general more specific is better, but I don't think it is an error to list a more generic type as long as it still correctly describes the file.
In reply to Re: Comparing different MIME type checking modules
by DStaal
in thread Comparing different MIME type checking modules
by saurabh.hirani
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |